Home/Projects/Cambridge Faculty Building
Education

Cambridge Faculty Building

Four thousand square metres of teaching and research space for the University of Cambridge. BREEAM Excellent, delivered with Kier Construction.

Client
University of Cambridge
Sector
Education
Completed
2024
Floor area
4,200 m²
Headline numbers

Four Numbers That Tell The Story.

38%
Energy use reduced against the Building Regulations Part L baseline, achieved through air-source heat pumps replacing gas boilers, MVHR ventilation, and high-efficiency LED lighting throughout.
BREEAM
Excellent rating awarded, exceeding the original target of Very Good. The post-occupancy data has continued to track design intent through the first year of operation.
120 tCO₂
Annual carbon saving against the previous building on the site, equivalent to taking around sixty cars off the road for a year.
On programme
Delivered to the original commissioning date despite a four-week delay during early ground works, recovered through close coordination with the contractor.
The project in detail

A Faculty Building Designed To Perform.

Cambridge Faculty Building exterior context

Site context, looking west toward the historic college frontage.

01 The starting point

The Brief

The University was replacing an ageing teaching block with a new four-storey building accommodating lecture theatres, teaching spaces and academic offices for around four hundred students.

The brief was specific on three points: a BREEAM Very Good rating as a minimum (BREEAM is the UK’s environmental rating for buildings), gas-free heating, and operation within tight running cost targets aligned with the University's net-zero estate strategy. Sharman Grimwade was appointed at the early design stage to lead the full building services design across heating, electrics and water, working alongside Hollings Architects and Kier Construction as the main contractor.

Site constraints between listed buildings

The constrained site sits between two listed buildings, limiting external plant placement.

02 What made it hard

The Challenge

Three constraints made the project unusual.

First, the site sat between two listed buildings, which limited any external plant and ruled out the obvious roof-mounted heat pump array we would normally specify. Second, the University's existing low-temperature heat network ran along one boundary, offering a connection but also adding coordination complexity.

Third, the BREEAM rating was lifted to Excellent during early stages, which tightened embodied-carbon and water-use targets significantly without an increase in the construction budget.

Plant room with installed building services

The split heating strategy: heat network connection plus a contained heat pump bank in the utility wing.

03 How we designed it

The Solution

We split the heating strategy. The lower-temperature requirements of the new building are met by a connection to the University's heat network, with a top-up bank of air-source heat pumps located within a contained acoustically-treated enclosure on a single-storey utility wing where they don't impinge on the listed setting.

MVHR provides ventilation throughout with passive cooling on academic offices and active cooling reserved only for the lecture theatres where occupancy demands it. On the electrical side, a coordinated LED scheme with daylight-linked controls keeps the lighting load low across the open teaching spaces, and a 44 kWp solar PV array on the roof contributes the renewable share toward the BREEAM target.

A smart BMS gives the University estate team full visibility of every plant item from a single dashboard, which was central to securing the operational performance commitment after handover.

Building in operation, post-occupancy

Performance through year one of operation has tracked design intent closely.

04 How it performs

The Outcome

The building is achieving a measured 38% energy reduction against the Part L baseline through its first year of occupation.

BREEAM Excellent was awarded post-construction, and the project was delivered to the original commissioning date despite a four-week delay during ground works. The University has used the same engineering design framework on two further commissioned buildings since.

Sustainability

How The Carbon Performance Was Achieved.

  • Air-source heat pumps replacing existing gas boilers
  • Mechanical ventilation with heat recovery (MVHR) throughout
  • LED lighting with daylight-linked controls and presence detection
  • 44 kWp rooftop solar PV array
  • Rainwater harvesting for non-potable uses
  • Smart BMS with full-system metering and monitoring
  • Low-flow sanitaryware throughout
  • EV charging-ready electrical infrastructure
Team and partners

Who We Worked With.

Architect
Hollings Architects (placeholder)
Main contractor
Kier Construction
Structural engineer
Brooks Structural
SG lead engineer
Jeremy Sharman
Quantity surveyor
Caldwell QS
BREEAM assessor
Greenway Sustainability

Sharman Grimwade led the engineering design with confidence and stayed with the project right through to commissioning. The result is a building that performs the way it was designed to, which is not something you can take for granted in our experience.

Sample testimonial · attribution pending client approval
Director of Estates, sample client
Similar project?

Have A Brief Like This One?

We are happy to look at briefs at any stage. The sooner we are involved, the more value the design tends to add.

Discuss your project What we do